|
-== THE SCREENPLAYS OF
QT ==-
"...remarkable, ground-breaking
screenwriting tutorial"
"...better than most of the screenwriting classes
I took way back when in the UCLA film program"
"...the strength of Screenwright is that it
presents fledgeling writers with a range of options, within which
to explore their own personal approach to screenwriting"
Screenwright: the craft of screenwriting
is my electronic screenwriting course. It is distributed by StoryCraft,
which is my story development tool of
choice (see review). A Screenwright demo is available online.
(NOTE: this article appeared in the Winter,
1994, issue of Creative Screenwriting journal.)
The Screenplays of Quentin Tarantino
by Charles Deemer
Since
1990, Quentin Tarantino has become one of the hottest writers and
directors in Hollywood, a sprint onto
center stage that culminated in the fall of 1994 with Pulp Fiction,
one of the most talked-about and controversial
films of the year.
On the surface, there
is nothing unusual about Tarantino's rise to fame in the star-driven
atmosphere of Hollywood - after all, the system demands that SOME
writer or other be this season's fair-haired genius. What
makes Tarantino's fame and fortune intriguing is the nature of his
screenwriting: to read a script by Quentin Tarantino is to be exposed
to the artful breaking of the major textbook and seminar "golden
rules" of the craft.
Already the term "Tarantino
script" has entered the parlance of producers. More than one
screenwriter on the Internet's Screenwriter's List has reported
news from a "prodco" that "Tarantino-type scripts" were being sought
- an extraordinary feat of influence, considering how much of the
"common wisdom" of screenwriting Tarantino disregards in his screenplays.
In this article, I will
look carefully at four scripts by Quentin Tarantino - Reservoir
Dogs (1990), True Romance (1991), Natural Born Killers (1991), and
Pulp Fiction (1993). My focus will be on his writing technique
and, in particular, I will offer an answer to the question, "What
is a Quentin Tarantino screenplay?" I also will look at how
the answer to this question has changed and been refined over time,
at how Tarantino has developed as a writer.
Reservoir Dogs
This
story of a botched jewelry store heist is an extraordinary debut
for a writer and filmmaker. Not only does
Tarantino define what will become his special territory - the male-centered
criminal world - but the techniques and influences that Tarantino
explores and refines in his later screenplays are mostly evident
here, including the writer's challenge to the accepted model of
the well-crafted screenplay. Drawing on influences from the
theater (playwriting) more than from the paradigm of the Hollywood
film that has risen from countless screenplay books, college courses
and weekend seminars, in Reservoir Dogs Tarantino weaves a story
that is as refreshingly unusual as film as it would have been ordinary
(in its structure) on the live stage.
In this screenplay, Tarantino
depends on two dramatic writing techniques common to theater but
rare - and even warned against - in screenwriting: the extended
monologue and the long, leisurely-paced scene (in Taratino's hands,
these two techniques usually depend on one another). He also
is more inventive with chronology than traditional screenwriting
wisdom would advise, although plays frequently take such liberties
with plot, and as a playwright often does, he tells his story through
an ensemble cast rather than through a clear individual hero.
The story outline of
Reservoir Dogs is quite ordinary, and a breakdown of the film into
its major chronological sequences would look something like this:
1. A big boss, Joe Cabot,
with the assistance of his son, nice guy Eddie, puts together a
gang of strangers to rob a jewelry
store.
2. A policeman, after
undergoing extensive training to be an underground cop, manages
to become a part of Cabot's gang.
3. Cabot and his new
gang have various meetings to plan the job but remain anonymous
to one another, giving themselves the names of colors.
The job is staked out.
4. With the cops warned
by the undercover agent, the robbery attempt ends in a shootout.
Some in the gang are killed; others are wounded and get away.
5. After the robbery,
Mr. White and Mr. Orange, the underground cop (who is wounded),
convene at a warehouse, meeting Mr. Pink there. There is a feeling
that someone set them up. Bickering between White and Pink culminates
in a fight.
6. Mr. Blonde arrives
at the warehouse, bringing a cop as hostage.
7. Nice guy Eddie arrives
at the warehouse, learning that Mr. Pink has stashed a bag of jewels.
When Eddie, White and Pink leave to get the stash, Blonde tortures
the cop. But Mr. Orange, the undercover cop who is wounded, recovers
enough to shoot Blonde. The hostage-cop knows Orange is an
undercover colleague.
8. Eddie and the others
return, seeing the mess above. Eddie tries unsuccessfully to find
out what the hell went on during his absence.
9. Boss man Cabot arrives
- and he has figured out that Orange is the undercover cop.
But Mr. White disagrees, raising a gun to protect his new
friend, Orange, whom he rescued and drove to the warehouse. There
is a standoff.
10. hen gunfire breaks out
after Cabot shoots Orange - immediately after which the cops arrive,
adding fuel to the shootout. Everyone in the gang is blown
away, leaving an empty screen at movie's end.
To get
a notion of how Tarantino reshapes this ordinary story into an extraordinary
dramatic structure, consider the story elements in the non-chronological
order that the film delivers them (numbers refer to the sequence
numbers above, with letters depicting chronology within each unit).
Also note the page-length of each scene, remembering that common
wisdom in screenwriting dictates that scenes longer than three pages
(or three minutes) are difficult to sustain.
Order of Sequences in Reservoir Dogs
3C (pp1-12); 4D (pp12-3);
5A (pp13-20); 4C (pp20-1);5B (pp21-32); 6A (pp32-7); 1A (pp38-46);
7A (pp46-53); 7B (pp53-5); 7C (pp55-7); 2A (pp58-61);2B (pp61-2);
2C (pp63); 2D (pp63-5); 2E (pp65-9); 2F (pp69-70; 2G (pp70-3); 4A
(pp74-5); 3A (pp75-83); 2G (pp83-5); 3B (pp85-7); 4A (pp87-9); 8A
(pp90-5); 9A (pp95-9); 10A (pp99-100).
The story, then, is told in a non-chronological
fashion that on first analysis appears to be almost random. The
sequence of story elements goes this way:
3-4-5-4-5-6-1-7-2-4-3-2-3-4-8-9-10.
The
first thing we notice is that the longer-than-3-minute scene is
the rule rather than the exception here, a breaking with conventional
wisdom that becomes a common parameter in a Tarantino script.
How does the writer get away with this? In two ways: first,
by giving long scenes great rhetorical interest in their own right
(playwrights often use "rhetoric-as-action" in this way, screenwriters
seldom do); and second, by placing these scenes within a structure
in which shock transitions set them in dramatic relief, giving an
element of foreboding or recovery to "talky" scenes that set up
or follow scenes of considerable action and violence. Indeed,
when the rhetorical energy gets high in a Tarantino script, either
something terrible is about to happen - or something just has, from
which we
need recovery.
Let's look at some examples
of these techniques at work.
The first two scenes
of Reservoir Dogs last 12 and 2 minutes - the first shows Tarantino's
rhetorical wit at work as the gang members (about whom we know nothing
yet) verbally spar at a restaurant. Two typical Tarantino
ploys are at work here: the subject matter is interesting in its
own right, often involving pop culture, and the rhetoric flows against
the grain of the real subtext, the not-yet-revealed dramatic foundation
of the scene:
MR. PINK
"Like a Virgin" is all about a girl who digs a guy with a big dick.
The whole song is a metaphor for big
dicks.
MR. BLUE
No it's not. It's about a girl who is very vulnerable and
she's been fucked over a few times. Then she meets some guy who's
really sensitive--
MR. PINK
--Whoa . . . whoa . . . time out Greenbay. Tell that bullshit
to the tourists. (p1)
And
so it goes, with all the members of the gang present (though we
have no idea who they are yet), horsing around, kidding one another,
until Cabot, who will prove to be the boss man, says (p10): "Okay
ramblers, let's get to rambling."
As the script continues,
we get our first real clue to what is really going on in this scene:
The eight men get up
to leave. Mr. White's waist is in the F.G. As
he buttons his coat, for a second we see he's carrying a gun.
They exit Uncle Bob's Pancake House, talking amongst themselves.
EXT. UNCLE BOB'S PANCAKE
HOUSE - DAY
CREDIT SEQUENCE
When the credit sequence
is finished, we FADE TO BLACK:
Over the BLACK we hear
the sound of SOMEONE SCREAMING in agony.
Under the screaming,
we hear the sound of a car HAULING ASS through traffic.
Over the screams and
the traffic noise, we hear SOMEBODY ELSE SAY:
SOMEBODY ELSE (VO)
Just hold on buddy boy.
Somebody
stops screaming long enough to say:
SOMEBODY (VO)
I'm sorry. I can't believe she killed me. Who would've fuckin'
thought that?
CUT TO:
INT.
GETAWAY CAR (MOVING) - DAY
The
Somebody screaming is Mr. Orange. He lies in the backseat.
He's been SHOT in the stomach. BLOOD covers both him and the
backseat.
Mr. White is the Somebody
Else. He's behind the wheel of the getaway car. He's
easily doing 80 mph, dodging in and out of traffic. (p12)
At work here is a dramatic
strategy that is part of Tarantino's signature: characters (almost
always male) banter, often about subject matter relating to pop
culture, in a way that goes against the grain of the real context
of the scene. The bantering above precedes the botched robbery -
the wounded Mr. Orange, in fact, is the undercover cop responsible
for the set up, but we don't learn this until much later. The transition
from rhetoric to action, from the playful veneer of the movie's
opening scene (amusing in itself) to its real meaning, is made in
a shocking and sudden way. One moment we are laid back, amused by
banter, and the next we are on the edge of our seat (as reader or
audience member), shocked into a new level of meaning.
Another shock transition
occurs when Mr. Blonde arrives at the warehouse after the botched
robbery. Instead of dragging the hostage cop in, he enters
alone, interrupting the fight between Pink and White. Then
Blonde leads them outside to the car:
Mr. Blonde opens up the
trunk of his car. A handcuffed, uniformed POLICEMAN is curled
up inside the trunk.
MR. BLONDE
So while we're waitin for Nice Guy Eddie, what say we have a little
fun finding out who the rat is.
INSERT: TITLE CARD "MR.
BLONDE."
INT. JOE CABOT'S OFFICE
-DAY
We're
inside the office of Joe Cabot. Joe's on the phone, sitting
behind his desk. (pp37-8)
We are
now, in fact, at the chronological beginning of the story - and
Tarantino has hooked us with considerable bait to keep our attention
while he fills in the background of the story: there's the suspicion
of a rat among the gang members and a policeman has been taken hostage.
Our need to know "What happens next?" - the great driving foundation
of all entertainment - is manipulated with the skill of a magician
by Tarantino, who dishes out the pieces of his story-puzzle in a
way that teases us with possibilities, giving the story a rhythm
that fluctuates between shock and leisure, leisure and shock.
Another shock transition
lets us know, before the gang members do, that Mr. Orange is the
undercover cop. Blonde has been torturing the hostage policeman.
Mr. Blonde POURS the gasoline
all over the cop, who's BEGGING him not to do this.
Mr. Blonde just sings
along with Stealer's Wheel.
Mr. Blonde LIGHTS up
a match and, while mouthing:
MR. BLONDE
'Clowns to the left of me, Jokers to the right. Here I am, stuck
in the middle with you.'
He moves
the match up to the cop . . .
. . . When a bullet EXPLODES
in Mr. Blonde's chest.
The
HANDHELD camera WHIPS to the right and we see the bloody Mr. Orange
FIRING his gun.
We cut back and forth
between Mr. Blonde taking BULLET HITS and Mr. Orange emptying his
weapon.
Mr. Blonde FALLS down
dead. (pp55-6)
But
no sooner have we recovered from the shock transition above than
Tarantino gives us a new surprise, a leisurely developed sequence
of background information ("INSERT: TITLE CARD "MR. ORANGE &
MR. WHITE") in which we learn about Orange's preparation to go undercover.
In this sequence, Tarantion
pulls off a rare screenwriting feat, an extremely long monologue
as Orange rehearses a story that will sell his criminal background
to the rest of the gang and make him "one of the boys." The
monologue, which I only excerpt below, begins as Freddy (Orange)
reads from a script in his apartment:
Freddy paces back and
forth, in and out of frame, rehearsing the anecdote.
He's reading it pretty good, but he's still reading it from the
page, and every once in a while he stumbles over his words.
FREDDY
. . . this was during the Los Angeles marijuana drought of '86.
I still had a connection. Which was insane, 'cause you couldn't
get weed anyfuckinwhere then. Anyway, I had a connection with
this hippie chick up in Santa Cruz . . . (pp62-3)
The
monologue continues but the setting moves:
Another empty frame,
except obviously outside. Freddy enters frame from the same
direction he exited in the previous scene, finishing his sentence.
When we move to a wider shot we see Freddy performing his monolog
to Holdaway in a parking lot. (p63)
Later
in the monologue, we move again:
Freddy, Joe, Nice Guy
Eddie and Mr. White all sit around a table in a red-lighted smokey
bar. Freddy continues his story. The crooks are enjoying
the hell out of it. (p65)
Not
only has the rehearsal paid off, Freddy/Orange's story is working,
but the tension here is considerable because Tarantino has let us
know what the gang members do not. As Freddy continues the
monologue, Tarantino adds even more visual variety by depicting
the action of the story-telling as an imaginary flashback.
This must be one of the
longest monologues in recent film history - and it works like a
charm. We are already well hooked into the story by the time
Tarantino covers this part of the back story but additionally the
scene gives us sympathy for Freddy/Orange, making us aware of the
considerable preparation and risk involved in going
underground.
The main techniques of
"the Tarantino method" of screenwriting are already well-honed in
Reservoir Dogs: a plot that fluctuates between scenes of shock/action
and leisure/rhetoric; male bantering (often about subjects relating
to pop culture) that goes against the grain of the real story and
sets up or relieves shock transitions; and
the extended monologue, in which rhetoric (story-telling) itself
becomes a kind of action, as well as contributing to character development
and often to scene tension.
In his next film, True
Romance, Tarantino fine-tunes many of these skills and expands their
comic possibilities in a story more simply told than Reservoir Dogs.
True Romance
In structural
terms, True Romance is Tarantino's simplest and most traditional
screenplay to date, weaving together two main story-threads in a
chronological development. The story develops this way:
Clarence
is a man whose "bedroom is a pop culture explosion," an Elvis freak
who carries on imagined conversations with the King. When he is
picked up by Alabama, a call girl hired by his brother as a birthday
present, it's a fated case of love at first sight that is not compromised
even when Alabama confesses her true motive in picking him up at
the Kung Fu triple feature. They immediately get married.
The hitch is, Alabama
has a pimp, Drexl. In fact, we meet Drexl before we meet Clarence,
in one of those rhetorically playful scenes like those we've seen
above, which promise to foreshadow trouble. Here trouble happens
as early as page 10, where Drexl suddenly interrupts what has been
comic banter among drug dealers about oral sex: "Then in a
blink, he points the shotgun at Floyd and BLOWS him away."
Violence, as so often in a Tarantino script, comes out of nowhere
as shock transition. In this case, Drexl's reward is a considerable
haul of cocaine.
When the fact that Alabama
has a pimp begins to eat at Clarence, these two story threads -
one connecting to Alabama's past, the other to her possible future
- move together. While in the restroom, Clarence has a vision of
Elvis:
Clarence splashes water
on his face trying to wash away the images that keep polluting
his mind.
EXTREME
CLOSE ON: a hand with a white rhinestone studded sleeve, rhythmically
snapping his fingers to a non-existent beat.
Then Clarence hears a
familiar VOICE. A voice that belongs to the hand.
FAMILIAR VOICE (O.S.)
Well, can you live with it?
Clarence
turns and doesn't act surprised. The Voice belongs to ELVIS (who
we only glimpse in EXTREME CLOSEUPS).
CLARENCE
What?
ELVIS
Can you live with it?
CLARENCE
Live with what?
ELVIS
With that sonofabitch walkin' around breathin' the same air as you?
And getting away with it every day. Are you haunted?
CLARENCE
Yeah.
ELVIS
You wanna get unhaunted?
CLARENCE
Yeah.
ELVIS
Then do what you gotta do." (pp31-2)
Later
Clarence admits:
CLARENCE
If I thought I could get away with it--
ELVIS
Killin' 'im's the hard part. Gettin' away with it's the easy
part. Whaddya think the cops do when a pimp's killed?
Burn the midnight oil tryin' to find out who done it? They
couldn't give a flyin' fuck if all the pimps in the whole wide world
took two in the back of the fuckin' head. If you don't get caught
at the scene with the smokin' gun in your hand, you got away with
it. (p33)
So Clarence
goes off to find his bride's pimp, Drexl, doing what he's gotta
do, and enters a typical "fish-out-of-water" scene that Tarantino
manipulates with great skill. Once again he drives the
scene with shock transitions and extended monologues, combining
them to give the scene a rhetorical power more commonly associated
with theater.
Meeting the pimp, Clarence
turns down the offer of a seat and dinner:
DREXL
No thanks? What does that mean? Means you ate before
you came on down here? All full? Is that it? Naw,
I don't think so. I think you're too scared to be
eatin'. Now, see, we're sitting down here ready to negotiate,
and you've already given up your shit. I'm still a mystery
to you. But I know exactly where your ass is comin'
from. See, if I asked you if you wanted some dinner
and you grabbed an eggroll and started to chow down, I'd say
to myself "This motherfucker's carryin' on like he ain't got
a care in the world. Who knows, maybe he don't. Maybe this
fool's such a bad motherfucker, he don't got to worry about nothin'.
He jus' sit down, eat my Chinese, watch my TV." See? You ain't
even sat down yet. On that TV there, since you been in the
room, is a woman with her titties hangin' out, and you ain't even
bothered to look. You jus' been starin' at me.
Now, I know I'm pretty, but I ain't as pretty as a couple a titties.
Clarence takes out an envelope and throws it
on the table.
CLARENCE
I'm not eatin' 'cause I'm not hungry. I'm not sittin'
'cause I'm not stayin'. I'm not lookin' at the movie 'cause
I saw it seven years ago. It's "The Mack" with Max Julian,
Carol Speed, and Richard Pryor, written by Bobby Poole, directed
by Michael Campus, and released by Cinema Releasing Company in nineteen-seventy-four.
I'm not scared of you. I just don't like you. In that
envelope is some payoff money. Alabama's moving on to some
greener pastures. We're not negotiating. I don't like to barter.
I don't like to dicker. I never have fun in Tijuana.
That price is non-negotiable. What's in that envelope is for
my peace of mind. My peace of mind is worth that much. Not
one penny more, not one penny more.
You could hear a pin
drop in the room. . . .
DREXL
It's empty." (pp38-9)
The enraged pimp attacks
Clarence, and it looks very bad for our would-be hero before he
is able to draw a .38 from his shoe and finish Drexl off in the
scene's concluding shock transition. Leaving, he grabs a suitcase
- which is filled with cocaine.
The main conflict in
the story is now defined: the big boss wants the cocaine back, while
Clarence and Alabama just want to live happily ever after.
They visit Clarence's dad, an ex-policeman who assures Clarence
that he's probably not in danger for killing a pimp (just as Elvis
had told him earlier), and Clarence decides to look up an actor
friend in Hollywood, who hopefully can sell the cocaine and earn
the newly weds a bankroll with which to start their new life.
The story moves quickly
in cat-and-mouse fashion now, as Clarence sets up the deal and the
gangsters trace their missing cocaine to Clarence, following him
to Hollywood. Along the way, Tarantino enriches the story
with his signature techniques, giving extended monologues to major
and minor characters alike, as well as turning the story abruptly
on shock transitions.
A gangster drills Clarence's
father about the son's whereabouts:
COCCOTTI
Sicilians are great liars. The best in the world. I'm a Sicilian
and my old man was the world heavyweight champion of Sicilian liars.
And from growin' up with him, I learned the pantomime. Now
there are seventeen different things a guy can do when he lies to
give himself away. A guy has seventeen pantomimes. A
woman's got twenty, but a guy's got seventeen. And if ya know
'em like you know yer own face, they beat lie detectors all to hell.
What we got here is a little game of show and tell. You don' wanna
show me nuthin'. But you're tellin' me everythin'. Now
I know you know where they are. So tell me before I do some damage
you won't walk away from. (p62)
Two
minutes later, in a shock transition, Coccotti "pumps THREE BULLETS
through Cliff's head" (p64).
Another gangster, who
has traced Alabama to a Hollywood Holiday Inn, demands to know where
Clarence is:
VIRGIL
Now, the first guy you kill is always the hardest. I don't care
if you're the Boston Strangler or Wyatt
Earp. You can be that Texas guy, Charles Whitman, the fella
who shot all them guys from that tower, I'll bet you green money
that first little black dot that he took a bead on was the bitch
of the bunch. No foolin', the first one's a tough one to hoe.
Now, the second one, while it ain't no Mardi Gras, it ain't half
as bad as the first. You still feel somethin', but it's just
so diluted this time around. Then you completely level off
on the third one. The third one's easy. It's gotten
to the point now I'll do it just to watch their expression change.
(p85)
Although Tarantino's
shock transitions are usually associated with violence, in True
Romance there are some wonderful surprises that work as comedy,
to lighten the moment. Comic moments like these will prove
to be a dry run for fuller development in Pulp Fiction.
In one example, Elliott,
who is Clarence's connection for selling the cocaine, is pulled
over for speeding. Caught with cocaine, he wants to pass it
to the bimbo riding with him.
ELLIOTT (frantically)
Just put it in your purse!
KANDI
I'm not gonna put that shit in my purse.
ELLIOTT
They won't search you, I promise. You haven't done anything.
KANDI
No way, Jose.
ELLIOTT
Please, they'll be here any second. Just put it in your bra.
KANDI
I'm not wearing a bra.
ELLIOTT (pleading)
Put it in your pants.
KANDI
No.
ELLIOTT
You're the one who wanted to drive fast.
KANDI
Read my lips. She mouths the word "no."
ELLIOTT
After all I've done for you, you fucking whore!
She goes to slap
him and hits the cocaine bag instead, it rips open. Cocaine
completely covers his blue suit, at that moment Elliott turns to
face a flashlight beam. Tears fill his eyes." (p91)
Elliott, an actor, is
blackmailed into being wired, which will give the cops an opportunity
to raid Clarence's deal. The cops wire Elliott and test the
equipment:
NICHOLSON
Okay, say something.
ELLIOTT (talking loud into the wire)
Hello! Hello! Hello! How now brown cow!
DIMES
Just talk regular.
ELLIOTT (normal tone)
"But soft. What light through yonder window breaks? 'Tis the
east and yonder Juliet is the sun. Oh, arise fair sun and
kill the envious moon that is sick and pale with grief--"
WORLITZER (to the LA Officer at the tape machine)
Are you getting this shit? (p102)
Cops and gangsters finally
all converge on Clarence's dope deal, ending in a Mexican standoff
(Taratino is fond of this device, using it twice in Reservoir Dogs
as well as in later work) while Clarence is in the bathroom talking
to Elvis. All hell breaks loose, but in the chaos and confusion
that ensues, not only are Clarence and Alabama able to walk
away unnoticed -but with a suitcase filled with the drug deal money.
They live happily ever after in a Mexican beach town, raising their
child named Elvis.
Although True Romance
looks in many ways like the well-made Hollywood screenplay, particularly
in its driving, focused, chronological structure, Tarantino depends
much more on rhetoric-as-action than most screenwriters dare.
There are more monologues - and good ones - here than in a dozen
"typical" scripts that follow the paradign of economy. As in Reservoir
Dogs, these monologues are usually framed by loud scenes of great
violence, giving them - and the audience - a kind of relief, a context
in which rhetoric is not only acceptable (no small feat in a society
decreasingly literate, increasingly visual) but welcomed.
During a Tarantino monologue, we get to catch our breath even as
we become tense with anticipation, waiting for the next shock transition.
Although the underworld
of crime is still Tarantino's territory, in True Romance Clarence
and Alabama are sympathetic heroes, the first a fish out of water,
the second a victim with a chance to change her life, and we are
with them all the way. In his next screenplay, Natural Born
Killers, the writer returns to the seedier roots of Reservoir Dogs,
where we find characters much more difficult to admire.
Natural Born Killers
This
story of Mickey and Mallory Knox, a husband-wife team of psychotic
killers, is Tarantino's least successful screenplay. Here,
for the first time, the story occasionally drags under the weight
of its own structure and rhetoric. But even at that the screenplay
is more cohesive than Oliver Stone's flamboyantly stylized film
(for which Tarantino gets story credit only), which begins as a
bad marriage between MTV and Saturday Night Live before moving closer
to Tarantino's vision, if without most of the structure necessary
to sustain it.
The problem here is not
that the Knoxes are unsympathetic characters, though this is true
enough; we also have little sympathy for most of the characters
in Reservoir Dogs, which is still a gripping script. Here the problems
are focus and distance: by carrying the story on the subplot of
a slimy TV journalist, Wayne Gayle, who is putting together an episode
for "American Maniacs," we get more a sense of the Knoxes as media
images and inventions than as people in the flesh, as psychotic
as they may be. This distancing is a weakness not found in the writer's
other screenplays.
A characteristic shock
transition draws us into the film quickly, giving us a rare personal
look at the Knoxes at work before Tarantino's structure starts pushing
them away. While Mickey eats pie at a diner's counter, Mallory gyrates
a sexy dance to a jukebox tune, turning-on a male customer.
OTIS
Hells Bells! Don't stop now sugar. I'm just getting
warmed up.
Otis give her his best
shit-eating grin before turning to Sonny.
Sonny gurgles out a laugh.
SONNY
Hey, I think she's sweet on you.
Otis turns to Mallory
as she PUNCHES him hard in the face, spinning him around.
Sonny spews a mouthful
of Highlife.
Mallory
grabs the back of Otis' head and SMASHES it down on the table, cracking
the linoleum. (p4)
After Mickey and Mallory
make a blood bath in the diner, the story suddenly bolts forward
in time. The Knoxes have been arrested but are so troublesome
as prisoners that fake medical charges have been trumped up so they
can be moved to an insane asylum. Preparation for the move, along
with the appearance of Wayne Gayle to do a story on the Knoxes for
"American Maniacs," now become the focus of the story.
Unfortunately, the TV
show device pushes the immediate dramatic question into the background
- will they be moved successfully or not? Although Tarantino
fills flashbacks (packaged as parts of the emerging show) with his
characteristic shock transitions and extended monologues, everything
feels removed, at too great a distance.
When a prison riot begins
during Gayle's interview with MIckey, the pair manage to escape
by taking the slimy TV commentator as hostage. After Gayle has served
his purpose, he too is murdered, and we are at the end of the story
with the "natural born killers" still on the loose, ready to murder
and torture the innocent and unsuspecting on yet another day.
This is a bleak ending,
even for Tarantino, and unrelentingly so, without even the banter
of his earlier scripts to lighten the mood along the way.
Redeeming qualities that we find in Reservoir Dogs with its sympathetic
undercover cop and in True Romance with its unusual fish-out-of-water
lovers are missing here. In the insane
world of Natural Born Killers, insanity wins out.
Tarantino may have learned
something in writing such a bleak vision because he turned next
to Pulp Fiction. Here we find a masterful weaving of all his earlier
techniques, to which something very new is added: the suggestion
of possible redemption in the violent and amoral universe inhabited
by his lowlife characters.
Pulp Fiction
On the
title page of this screenplay is the description, "Three stories
. . . about one story." A table of contents follows:
1. Prologue
2. Vincent Vega & Marcellus Wallace's Wife
3. The Gold Watch
4. Jules, Vincent, Jimmie & the Wolf
5. Epilogue
The
three stories are numbers 2, 3 and 4 above - but the prologue and
epilogue constitute an essential frame action to Tarantino's meaning
and become a fourth story in their own right, even though only the
named stories are introduced with the formality of on-screen titles
(a device used in Reservoir Dogs and, in a variation, in Natural
Born Killers as well).
What Tarantino accomplishes
in Pulp Fiction is almost literary in nature: a collection of short
stories, if you will, that - like Sherwood Anderson's Winesburg,
Ohio - depicts a common world with common characters, letting each
story stand alone (with its own beginning, middle and end) but also
reflect off the others, so that the whole becomes greater than the
sum of its parts, especially since Tarantino delivers the stories
in their best dramatic order for his meaning (which also means,
out of chronological sequence).
Pulp Fiction opens with
a frame action, in the same setting and Prologue-Epilogue storyline
with which it will end. Two low-level liquor store robbers,
described as Young Man and Young Woman, are in a diner, where they
decide to change their focus to robbing restaurants - like the very
one they are in. The conclusion leads directly to a shock
transition:
YOUNG WOMAN
I love you, Pumpkin.
YOUNG MAN
I love you, Honey Bunny.
And with that, Pumpkin
and Honey Bunny grab their weapons, stand up and rob the restaurant.
Pumpkin's robbery persona is that of the in-control professional.
Honey Bunny's is that of the psychopathic, hair-triggered, loose
cannon.
PUMPKIN (yelling to all)
Everybody be cool, this is a robbery!
HONEY BUNNY
Any of you fuckin' pricks move and I'll execute every one of you
motherfuckers! Got that? (p7)
We cut
to Vincent and Jules, bantering in a car about Vincent's three-year
stay in Amsterdam. Tarantino leaves us on the edge of our
seats, not returning to the scene above until the end of the movie,
moving immediately into a more leisurely paced scene with comic
overtones, which turns out to be the second part of the Prologue.
Jules, who is black, learns that in Holland a Quarter Pounder with
Cheese is called "Royale with Cheese" and asks what a Whopper is
called.
VINCENT
I dunno. I didn't go into a Burger King. But you know
what they put on french fries in Holland instead of Ketchup?
JULES
What?
VINCENT
Mayonnaise.
JULES
Goddamn!
VINCENT
I seen 'em do it. And I don't mean a little bit on the side
of the plate, they fuckin' drown 'em in it.
JULES
Ouccch!
CUT TO:
INT. CHEVY (TRUNK) -
MORNING
The trunk
of the Chevy opens up. Jules and Vincent reach inside, taking
out two .45 Automatics, loading and cocking them.
JULES
We should have shotguns for this kind of deal. (p9-10)
The
banter in the car has been against the grain, both relief from the
shock transition of the restaurant robbery and preface to the shock
transition of the violent scene yet to come. This device is
used time and time again in each of Tarantino's screenplays.
The end of the Prologue,
the moment before the title of our first "official" story, is intense.
Vincent and Jules are there to punish clients of their boss, Marcellus
Wallce, for a deal gone wrong and to retrieve a "black snap briefcase,"
the contents of which emit "a small glow," giving it almost mythic
meaning, like an underworld Holy Grail. Banter and shocking
transitions of action fill the scene (Brett is one of the young
clients, obviously in much over his head):
BRETT
I just want you to know how sorry we are about how fucked
up things got between us and Mr. Wallace. When we entered into this
thing, we only had the best intentions--
As Brett
talks, Jules takes out his gun and SHOOTS Roger three times in the
chest. BLOWING him out of his chair.
Vince smiles to himself.
Jules has got style.
Brett has just shit his
pants. He's not crying or whispering, but he's so full
of fear, it's as if his body is imploding.
JULES (to Brett)
Oh, I'm sorry. Did that break your concentration? I didn't
mean to do that. Please, continue. I believe you were
saying something about "best intentions." (p22)
When
Brett is killed, it is preceded by an extended monologue that later
becomes essential to Tarantino's meaning as he later explores redemptive
possibilities in his crime-filled underworld:
JULES
There's a passage I got memorized, seems appropriate for this situation:
Ezekiel 25:17. "The path of the righteous man is beset
on all sides by the inequities of the selfish and the tyranny of
evil men. Blessed is he who, in the name of charity and good
will, shepherds the weak through this valley of darkness, for he
is truly his brother's keeper and the finder of lost children.
And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious
anger those who attempt to poison and destroy my brothers.
And you will know my name is the Lord when I lay my vengeance upon
you."
The two men EMPTY their
guns at the same time on the sitting Brett. (p25)
A third man, who will
be taken hostage and play an important role in the third story,
quivers in the corner. But a fourth, unknown to the killers,
has been in the bathroom, and at scene's end he comes out with his
gun blazing:
FOURTH MAN
Die...die...die...die...die...die!
The
fourth Man FIRES SIX BOOMING SHOTS from his hand cannon in the direction
of Vincent and Jules. He SCREAMS a maniacal cry of revenge
until he's DRY FIRING.
Then . . . his face does
a complete change of expression. It goes from a "Vengeance
is mine" expression to a "What the fuck?" blank look.
FOURTH MAN
I don't understand--
The fourth Man is BLOWN
OFF HIS FEET and OUT OF FRAME by bullets that TEAR HIM TO SHREDS.
He leaves
the FRAME EMPTY.
CUT TO:
Against
black, TITLE CARD: (p26)
and
the story of "Vincent Vega and Marcellus Wallace's Wife" begins.
Again, we are stunned: why did the fourth man miss at point blank
range (the answer will prove essential)? Both the first and
second parts of the Prologue end in the middle of acts of violence,
leaving the outcome unresolved. We are hooked in spades.
Tarantino's first titled
story is a black comedy that would stand alone as a short film.
The big boss, Marcellus Wallace, instructs Vincent to take his wife
out to dinner in his absence. After visiting his dealer to shoot
up with heroin, Vincent takes Mia, the wife, to a restaurant decorated
in the style of the fifties, with the hired help dressed like James
Dean, Buddy Holiday, Marilyn Monroe, Ed Sullivan and other icons
of the era (Tarantino using pop culture again).
The dinner goes well
- the couple even win a twist contest - until Vincent delivers Mia
home. While he's in the bathroom, convincing himself not to
make a move on her, she finds his stash of heroin, mistakes it for
cocaine, snorts it - and overdoses.
The shock transition
leaves Vincent with the wife of his boss in deep trouble.
If she dies, he's dead himself. Vincent
rushes Mia to his dealer's house, where the black comedy goes into
overdrive as Vincent and the dealer rush around looking for medical
books and antidotes - it's the Three Stooges in drugland.
Finally, Mia is revived and Vincent takes her home again, where
they make a pact to keep this secret among themselves.
Mia is Tarantino's most
fully realized female character, an exception to the rule in this
writer's very male world, and the banter between her and Vincent
has a sense of flirtation not seen elsewhere in Tarantino's work.
The shock transition of Mia's overdose twists the story in a very
different direction, where the comedy is all the darker because
Mia has become a rare Tarantino character, a woman with dimension
of character. We care about what happens to her.
The soft ending of the
first story (Mia says, "See ya 'round, Vince") cuts to a flashback
that serves as prologue to "The Gold Watch," where an Army captain
gives a young boy the watch belonging to his deceased father, telling
the boy about the watch's strange (and darkly comic) history.
The boy is Butch, snapping
out of a dream that was the flashback, a boxer whom Marcellus Wallace
is ordering to take a dive. But Butch has his own plan: to bet on
himself, getting great odds once word of the fix hits the streets.
He plans to win, take the money and skip the country with his French
girlfriend.
The story is complicated
when the girlfriend forgets to get Butch's precious watch, the one
that belonged to his grandfather and father, with the rest of his
belongings from the apartment (they hide out in a motel right after
the fight). So Butch goes back to his apartment to get his
watch.
Meanwhile, of course,
Wallace has his thugs looking for the boxer who double-crossed him.
And who should be waiting in Butch's apartment but Vincent - who
is in the bathroom when Butch arrives. Tarantino sets this scene
up in typical fashion, leisurely leading us to a shock transition
that will twist our perceptions about the scene's real meaning:
Sure enough, there's
the watch . . . on the bedside table, hanging on his little
kangeroo statue.
He puts
the milk on the table, takes the watch, checks the time and puts
it on. Smiling, Butch grabs the milk and exits the bedroom.
He walks
through the apartment and back into the kitchen.
He opens a cupboard and
takes out a box of Pop Tarts.
Putting down the milk,
he opens the box, takes out two Pop Tarts and puts them in the toaster.
Butch
glances to his right, his eyes fall on something.
What
he sees is a small compact Czech M61 submachine gun with a huge
silencer on it, lying on his kitchen counter.
BUTCH (softly)
Holy shit.
He picks
up the intimidating piece of weaponry and examines it.
Then
. . . a toilet FLUSHES. (p95-6)
After
Butch blows Vincent away, he leaves but is not home free, not by
a long shot. In a shock transition that seems contrived (rare
for Tarantino), Marcellus himself crosses in front of Butch's car
at a crosswalk - and the chase is on. Butch tries to run over
him, crashes his car, and then both men take up the chase on foot
through city streets, ending up in a pawnshop that proves to be
one of Tarantino's most bizarre environments.
The pawnshop is run by
Maynard, who with his brother Zek run a back room for sexual psychopaths.
The brothers capture both Butch and Marcellus, choosing the latter
as their first victim upon whom to perpetrate their unnatural acts
of rape. An S&M figure called The Gimp is left to watch
over Butch, who is tied up in a chair.
Tarantino is pulling
out all stops here - the black comedy of the first story was considerable,
here it is even more bizarrely comic (and the blackest comedy still
is yet to come!). But Butch manages to get loose and has a
chance to escape. But he doesn't:
Butch
decides for the life of him, he can't leave anybody in a situation
like that. So he begins rooting around the pawnshop for a
weapon to bash these hillbillies' heads in with.
He picks
up a big destructive-looking hammer, then discards it, not destructive
enough. He picks up a chainsaw, thinks about it for a moment,
then puts it back. Next, a large Louisville slugger he tries
on for size. But then he spots what he's been looking for:
A Samurai sword. (p105-6)
Like the rescue scene
in the first story, there is a touch of the silent comedy here,
an extended sequence that milks the scene for all it is worth.
When Butch rescues Marcellus,
they make a compromise peace with the same conditions made by Vincent
and Mia in the first story: nobody else is to know about what happened.
Butch and his French girlfriend make their getaway, presumably to
live happily ever after.
The third story, "Jules,
Vincent, Jimmie and the Wolf," is set up with what may be the greatest
shock transition in the film:
TITLE
DISAPPEARS.
Over
black, we can HEAR in the distance, men talking.
JULES (OS)
You ever read the Bible, Brett?
BRETT (OS)
Yes!
JULES (OS)
There's a passage I got memorized . . .
and
he begins to recite from Ezekiel 25:17 again. But now the
scene continues from a different perspective:
FADE UP:
INT. BATHROOM - DAY
We're in the bathroom
of the Hollywood apartment we were in earlier. In fact, we're
there at exactly the same time. Except this time, we're in the bathroom
with the FOURTH MAN. (p112)
And this time the strange
inability of the fourth man to hit his close targets is given a
possible explanation:
JULES
That shit wasn't luck. That shit was somethin' else.
Vincent
prepares to leave.
VINCENT
Yeah, maybe.
JULES
That was . . . divine intervention. You know what divine intervention
is?
VINCENT
Yeah, I think so. That means God came down from Heaven and
stopped the bullets.
JULES
Yeah man, that's what it means. That's exactly what it means!
God came down from Heaven and stopped the bullets.
VINCENT
I think we should be going now. (p114)
This
unlikely explanation, comic in its context here, becomes a serious
motivation at film's end, where Jules does something none of Tarantino's
lowlife characters has done before: takes action to turn his life
around. But before this turn around, which gives Pulp Fiction
a less whimsical, more thoughtful dramatic resolution than the
writer's earlier work, Tarantino uses a shock transition to jolt
us into one final excursion into the black comedy of the Three Stooges
in gangland: Vincent accidentally blows away Marvin, who was taken
hostage from the apartment, splattering brains, guts and blood all
over the car and all over himself and Jules (this, by the way, is
done with much more economy in the film than in the script, where
Tarantino reduces the shock value by extending the event, p116-8).
Against this gruesome
context, Tarantino again pulls out all stops, giving banter and
against-the-grain dialogue full reign, as when the bloody pair clean
up at a friend's house (Jimmie) while figuring out what to do:
JULES
I used the same soap you did and when I dried my hands, the towel
didn't look like a fuckin' Maxie pad. Look, fuck it, alright.
Who cares? But it's shit like this that's gonna bring the
situation to a boil. If he were to come in here and see that
towel like that . . . I'm tellin' you Vincent, you best be cool.
'Cause if I gotta get in to it with Jimmie on account of you . .
. Look, I ain't threatenin' you, I respect you an' all, just don't
put me in that position. (p121)
Or later,
after Marcellus Wallace sends "The Wolf" to rescue is comicly inept
pair, when Jules finds himself cleaning out the worst part of the
mess in the car while Vincent complains:
JULES
You're gettin' ready to blow? I'm a mushroom-cloud-layin'
motherfucker! Every time my fingers touch brain I'm "SUPERFLY
T.N.T.," I'm the "GUNS OF NAVARONE." I'm what Jimmie Walker
usta talk about. In fact, what the fuck am I doin' in the
back? You're the motherfucker should be on brain detail.
We're tradin'. I'm washin' windows and you're pickin' up this
nigger's skull. (p133)
Cleaned up in a different
context, this situation and dialogue are straight out of Laurel
and Hardy.
When
Wolf successfully rescues them, getting the car cleaned up and delivered
to a junk yard, Vincent and Jules - their bloody clothes exchanged
for nerdy-looking jock attire - decide to grab some breakfast.
And this takes them to
the restaurant where the film begins, at the moment before Pumpkin
and Honey Bunny decide to rob it.
The chronology has become
so eskew, there's almost a sense that Vincent has come back from
the dead when we see him in the restaurant. But Tarantino's
dramatic arrangement is perfect (for the record, he puts the table-of-contents
in this dramatic order: 1B-4-1A-5-2-3).
Jules' transformation
is complete by now; as he tells Vincent, who goes to the bathroom
just before the robbery begins, "I was just sitting here drinking
my coffee, eating my muffin', playing the incident in my head, when
I had what alcoholics refer to as a "moment of clarity." (p148)
What Jules means by this
is revealed at the end of the film - after Tarantino's customary
standoff and after Jules uncharacteristically lets the young robbers
get away with all the stash except his own wallet (telling them:
"Now this is the situation. Normally both of your asses would be
dead as fuckin' fried chicken. But you happened to pull this shit
while I'm in a transitional period" (p155)). The revelation
is that even in Tarantino's male world of crime, redemption is possible.
After citing Ezekiel 25:17 in full again, Jules goes on:
JULES
...I been sayin' that shit for years. And if you ever heard
it, it meant your ass. I never really questioned what it meant.
I thought it was just a cold-blooded thing to say to a motherfucker
'fore you popped a cap in his ass. But I saw some shit this
mornin' made me think twice. Now I'm thinkin', it could mean
you're the evil man. And I'm the righteous man. And
Mr. .45 here, he's the shepherd protecting my righteous ass in the
valley of darkness. Or it could be you're the righteous man
and I'm the shepherd and it's the world that's evil and selfish.
I'd like that. But that shit ain't the truth. The truth is
you're the weak. And I'm the tyranny of evil men. But I'm
tryin'. I'm tryin' real hard to be a shepherd. (p158)
On which note they leave
the restaurant, and the film ends.
Pulp
Fiction is an extraordinary accomplishment, for which Tarantino
prepared through his three earlier scripts, fine-tuning his signature
devices of non-chronological structure; extended monologues to reveal
character, build tension, and extend scenes; male banter against-the-grain
of the scene's real meaning; filling his world with images of pop
culture and moments of black comedy. These are the writing
techniques that answer the question, "What is a Tarantino screenplay?,"
and they are never more fully realized than in his most recent film.
And where now?
There are intriguing possibilities. Mia in Pulp Fiction is
Tarantino's first female character who doesn't come off as a cardboard
(even sexist?) strereotype. And the possibility of redemption
in Tarantino's bleak crime-filled world opens new doors of exploration.
But
no one familiar with Tarantino's work would second-guess this master
of the unexpected, except to safely predict: the next screenplay
and film, like those before it, will take us by surprise.
Charles Deemer, an award-winning playwright
and screenwriter, is the webmaster of
the Screenwriters and Playwrights Home Page on the Internet's
World Wide Web. Two of his screenplays are presently
optioned and in development by independent producers.
|